At last week's reunion, the AI-generated conversation prompts fell utterly flat

In my experience, tech can't substitute for authentic social intuition, no matter how advanced.

3 comments

3 Comments

Honestly, I've seen it work well in my book club when we felt stuck in a rut. The AI suggested this bizarre parallel between a modern novel and Greek tragedy that initially seemed off base. But arguing about it brought out such passionate, nuanced takes we'd never have reached on our own. Maybe the key is curating those prompts to fit the group's dynamic instead of using them straight out of the box.

wade2633h ago

Dig into the concept of AI prompts as discussion catalysts rather than replacements for intuition. When parker_wood79's group debated that Greek tragedy parallel, the friction generated real insight, so was the AI's role just to provide a provocative starting point? What specific elements of their book club's culture made that possible, and how can we replicate that in other social contexts? It feels like the failure at the reunion might stem from treating the tech as a host instead of a tool, missing the need for a human touch. Can we identify a framework for integrating AI suggestions that preserves organic conversation?

viola_anderson59m ago

Ever tried using an AI prompt only to realize you're arguing with a machine more than your friends, like @parker_wood79's group did? That friction is exactly what made their book club work, because they already had a culture of passionate debate where the AI was just a spark. Replicating that means designing prompts that challenge but don't dominate, so the human dynamics still drive the conversation.