23
Did a side-by-side test of charcoal briquettes vs lump for ribs yesterday
I always figured lump was just for looks, but I finally ran my own comparison on two racks of spare ribs. The lump charcoal gave a cleaner burn and way more consistent heat over 5 hours of smoking. Briquettes left this weird ashy taste on the bark that I never noticed before. Anybody else pick up a difference, or did I just get a bad bag of Kingsford?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
wadeyoung29d ago
Actually read something from Meathead at AmazingRibs about how binders in briquettes can mess with the flavor profile in longer cooks... explains a lot about that ashy taste you mentioned.
8
julia_jones7229d ago
Definitely changed my mind too. I used to grab whatever bag was cheapest at the store for long smokes. Did a 12 hour pork shoulder with standard Kingsford and it had this weird chemical aftertaste that I thought was just bad meat. Never connected it to the binder until I read that same article about how starch and limestone filler can get bitter after hours of heat. Switched to one of the all-natural lump brands for anything over 6 hours. No more off flavors.
3