21
Why does nobody talk about how the moon landing 'proof' actually contradicts itself?
I used to roll my eyes at anyone who questioned Apollo 11, thinking it was just crackpot stuff. Then last year I watched a breakdown of the radiation belt issue and how the Apollo astronauts supposedly passed through it without shielding. The numbers from NASA's own reports don't add up unless you ignore basic physics. Has anyone else looked into this and found other legit contradictions?
2 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In2 Comments
parker_jones5022d agoTop Commenter
Started looking into this after I saw a video comparing the shielding on Apollo versus what modern satellites use and it's wild how different they are. You'd think if they really sent people through that belt they'd have something closer to what we put on Mars rovers but nope. It reminds me of how people accept stuff in their daily lives without question like when a company says their product is "lab tested" and nobody asks what lab or what tests. Same pattern with big historical events - once enough people believe it you're the crazy one for double checking. The more I dig the more it feels like we're trained to trust official stories just because they're official.
8
cole_hall22d ago
Man have you actually looked at the Van Allen belt numbers yourself? The radiation dose they supposedly got doesn't match what NASA's own papers say about the zone.
5