Debate: do laser levels beat string lines for foundation work?

I tried using a rotary laser level on a slab pour in Phoenix last month instead of pulling string lines. The laser was faster to set up but gave me a 3/8 inch error across 40 feet because the tripod shifted on the dirt. My foreman said string lines are more reliable, but the laser saved me 2 hours of marking. Has anyone else found laser levels unreliable on uneven ground, or did I just pick a bad model?

2 comments

2 Comments

clark.kelly12d ago

Wait, is a 3/8 inch error over 40 feet really that big of a deal for a slab? I've seen concrete settle and crack way worse than that after a season. You set a tripod on dirt in Phoenix, that's like asking your wife to park your truck on loose gravel and not complain. The laser's faster and the error is within tolerance for most residential work, so why are we acting like this is a crisis? Maybe your foreman just likes pulling lines because that's what grandpa did, and it's not about reliability at all. The time you saved could cover fixing that tiny error ten times over, so isn't the real question whether perfect measurement even matters when concrete's involved?

nancy82412d ago

My uncle used to pour slabs in Vegas back in the 90s and he swore by a 2x4 with a level on it. Said "lasers are for people who can't read a bubble." Then one summer his level got left in a truck bed and warped so bad it showed level on a 3 degree slope. We joked that slab was built for a skate park.